//! 评分引擎 — 基于想法内容的多维度启发式评分
//!
//! 各维度分数均为 0-10（IPC 层会 *10 缩放为 0-100 以匹配前端）。
//! 启发式依据：优先级、描述充实度、标签、关键词信号——保证稳定且有区分度。
//! TODO: 接入 AI 做语义级深度评分。

use crate::capture::Idea;

/// 想法评分详情（重新导出 capture 模块中的定义）
pub use crate::capture::IdeaScores;

use df_types::types::Priority;

// ─── 启发式关键词(从 `scoring_keywords` 模块导入)───
//
// 关键词常量已拆至独立文件 `scoring_keywords.rs`。
// 启发式是过渡方案,对抗式评估上线后按需升级为 JSON 配置。
pub use crate::scoring_keywords::{
    FEASIBILITY_POSITIVE_KEYWORDS, FEASIBILITY_NEGATIVE_KEYWORDS,
    IMPACT_KEYWORDS, URGENCY_KEYWORDS,
};

/// 评分权重配置
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct ScoringWeights {
    pub feasibility: f64,
    pub impact: f64,
    pub urgency: f64,
}

impl Default for ScoringWeights {
    fn default() -> Self {
        Self {
            feasibility: 0.4,
            impact: 0.4,
            urgency: 0.2,
        }
    }
}

/// 评分引擎
pub struct ScoringEngine;

impl ScoringEngine {
    /// 使用默认权重计算评分
    pub fn compute_default(idea: &Idea) -> IdeaScores {
        Self::compute(idea, &ScoringWeights::default())
    }

    /// 使用指定权重计算评分
    pub fn compute(idea: &Idea, weights: &ScoringWeights) -> IdeaScores {
        let feasibility = Self::heuristic_feasibility(idea);
        let impact = Self::heuristic_impact(idea);
        let urgency = Self::heuristic_urgency(idea);

        let overall = feasibility * weights.feasibility
            + impact * weights.impact
            + urgency * weights.urgency;

        IdeaScores {
            feasibility,
            impact,
            urgency,
            overall,
        }
    }

    /// 启发式可行性评分（描述充实度 + 技术/资源信号词）
    fn heuristic_feasibility(idea: &Idea) -> f64 {
        let mut score = 5.0_f64;
        let desc = idea.description.trim();
        if !desc.is_empty() {
            score += 1.5;
        }
        let len = desc.chars().count();
        if (50..=500).contains(&len) {
            score += 1.0;
        } else if len > 500 {
            // 过长描述通常意味着实现复杂度上升
            score -= 0.5;
        }
        // 可行性正向信号
        let pos = count_any(desc, FEASIBILITY_POSITIVE_KEYWORDS);
        score += (pos as f64) * 0.5;
        // 复杂度负向信号
        let neg = count_any(desc, FEASIBILITY_NEGATIVE_KEYWORDS);
        score -= (neg as f64) * 0.6;
        score.clamp(0.0, 10.0)
    }

    /// 启发式影响力评分（优先级 + 价值信号词 + 标签广度）
    fn heuristic_impact(idea: &Idea) -> f64 {
        let mut score = match idea.priority {
            Priority::Critical => 8.0,
            Priority::High => 6.5,
            Priority::Medium => 5.0,
            Priority::Low => 3.5,
        };
        if !idea.tags.is_empty() {
            score += 0.5;
            // 标签越多影响面越广，上限 +1.0
            score += (idea.tags.len().min(4) as f64) * 0.25;
        }
        let desc = idea.description.trim();
        let value_hits = count_any(desc, IMPACT_KEYWORDS);
        score += (value_hits as f64) * 0.5;
        if desc.chars().count() > 100 {
            score += 0.5;
        }
        score.clamp(0.0, 10.0)
    }

    /// 启发式紧急度评分（优先级 + 时效信号词）
    fn heuristic_urgency(idea: &Idea) -> f64 {
        let mut score = match idea.priority {
            Priority::Critical => 9.0,
            Priority::High => 7.0,
            Priority::Medium => 5.0,
            Priority::Low => 3.0,
        };
        let desc = idea.description.trim();
        let time_hits = count_any(desc, URGENCY_KEYWORDS);
        score += (time_hits as f64) * 0.5;
        score.clamp(0.0, 10.0)
    }
}

/// 统计 text 中命中任一关键词的数量（小写匹配，兼顾中英文）
/// 局限:纯子串匹配,不识别"不复用""无用户增长"等否定前缀,接 LLM 后由语义层修正
/// 单字否定前缀:关键词紧邻这些字时该命中不计(「不复用」不计入「复用」正向命中)。
///
/// 注意「别」单字歧义大(别具/别的/特别 均非否定),故不进单字清单——
/// 祈使否定「别」改用两字清单兜底(别去/别再/别要/别用 等,见 NEGATION_PREFIXES_2)。
const NEGATION_PREFIXES_1: &[char] = &['不', '无', '非', '未', '没', '勿'];
/// 两字否定前缀:紧邻关键词的前两字符为这些时该命中不计(「没有复用」「并非简单」「别去复用」)。
const NEGATION_PREFIXES_2: &[&str] = &[
    "没有", "并非", "毫无", "不用", "不是",
    // 「别X」祈使否定:双字形式可精确匹配,规避「别具/别的/特别」等单字误伤
    "别去", "别再", "别要", "别用", "别做", "别给",
];

/// 关键词在 text 的 `end` 字节位置前是否处于否定上下文(紧邻否定词)。
///
/// `end` 是关键词起始字节位置(由 `str::find` 返回,必在 char 边界)。取 `text[..end]`
/// 末尾 1-2 个 char 判否定:单字否定(不/无/非/...)或两字否定(没有/并非/...)。
///
/// 仅取末尾 ≤2 个 char(rev().take(2) 流式),省去每次命中的 `Vec<char>` 分配。
fn is_negated_before(text: &str, end: usize) -> bool {
    if end == 0 {
        return false;
    }
    let before = &text[..end];
    // 末尾最多 2 char,按 [次末, 末] 顺序收集(n=1 时仅末位)
    let tail: Vec<char> = before.chars().rev().take(2).collect();
    if tail.is_empty() {
        return false;
    }
    // 单字否定:末位 char(tail[0]) 命中
    if NEGATION_PREFIXES_1.contains(&tail[0]) {
        return true;
    }
    // 两字否定:需凑齐 2 char,顺序为 [末, 次末] 反转回原序 [次末, 末]
    if tail.len() == 2 {
        let last2: String = [tail[1], tail[0]].iter().collect();
        if NEGATION_PREFIXES_2.contains(&last2.as_str()) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    false
}

/// 统计 text 中命中任一关键词的数量(小写匹配,兼顾中英文)。
///
/// 否定前缀处理:关键词紧邻否定词(不复用/无增长/非紧急...)时该命中不计,
/// 避免「不复用」反向计入「复用」正向分。双重否定(「不是不复用」)属罕见边缘,
/// 不处理(接 LLM 后语义层兜底)。
fn count_any(text: &str, keywords: &[&str]) -> usize {
    let lower = text.to_lowercase();
    keywords
        .iter()
        .filter(|kw| {
            // 至少一个非否定上下文的出现即计为命中(同一词多次出现,一次有效即可)
            let mut idx = 0usize;
            while let Some(rel) = lower[idx..].find(*kw) {
                let abs = idx + rel;
                if !is_negated_before(&lower, abs) {
                    return true;
                }
                idx = abs + kw.len();
            }
            false
        })
        .count()
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;
    use crate::capture::Idea;
    use df_types::types::{IdeaStatus, Priority};

    /// 辅助工厂：构造测试用 Idea（时间/ID 用默认值，不影响评分）
    fn make_idea(title: &str, desc: &str, priority: Priority, tags: Vec<&str>) -> Idea {
        Idea {
            id: "test-id".to_string(),
            title: title.to_string(),
            description: desc.to_string(),
            status: IdeaStatus::Draft,
            priority,
            scores: None,
            tags: tags.into_iter().map(String::from).collect(),
            source: None,
            related_ids: Vec::new(),
            created_at: chrono::Utc::now(),
            updated_at: chrono::Utc::now(),
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn s1_empty_idea_baseline() {
        let idea = make_idea("测试想法", "", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s1] 空想法 (Medium / 无描述 / 无标签)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  影响力={:.2}  紧急度={:.2}  综合={:.2}", s.feasibility, s.impact, s.urgency, s.overall);
        assert!((s.overall - 5.0).abs() < 0.01, "空想法 overall 应为 5.0, 实际 {:.2}", s.overall);
    }

    #[test]
    fn s2_high_priority_value_desc() {
        let desc = "面向用户的核心功能，带来显著增长，大幅提升效率。集成成熟方案，复用已有组件，快速交付价值。".repeat(3);
        let idea = make_idea("增长引擎", &desc, Priority::Critical, vec!["增长", "核心"]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s2] 高优先级 + 价值描述 (Critical / ~120字 / 含价值词)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  影响力={:.2}  紧急度={:.2}  综合={:.2}", s.feasibility, s.impact, s.urgency, s.overall);
        assert!(s.impact >= 7.0, "impact 应≥7.0, 实际 {:.2}", s.impact);
        assert!(s.urgency >= 8.0, "urgency 应≥8.0, 实际 {:.2}", s.urgency);
    }

    #[test]
    fn s3_low_priority_short_desc() {
        let idea = make_idea("小优化", "一句话", Priority::Low, vec![]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s3] 低优先级 + 短描述 (Low / 3字)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  影响力={:.2}  紧急度={:.2}  综合={:.2}", s.feasibility, s.impact, s.urgency, s.overall);
        assert!((s.overall - 4.6).abs() < 0.01, "overall 应为 4.6, 实际 {:.2}", s.overall);
    }

    #[test]
    fn s4_feasibility_positive_signals() {
        let idea = make_idea("复用方案", "复用已有组件，简单集成现成脚手架", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s4] 可行性正向信号 (含 复用/已有/简单/集成/现成/脚手架)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  (预期 9.5)", s.feasibility);
        assert!((s.feasibility - 9.5).abs() < 0.01, "正向信号 feasibility 应为 9.5, 实际 {:.2}", s.feasibility);
    }

    #[test]
    fn s5_feasibility_negative_signals() {
        let idea = make_idea("大重构", "大规模重构迁移，分布式重写从零开始", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s5] 可行性负向信号 (含 大规模/重构/迁移/分布式/重写/从零)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  (预期 ≤5.0)", s.feasibility);
        assert!(s.feasibility <= 5.0, "负向信号 feasibility 应≤5.0, 实际 {:.2}", s.feasibility);
    }

    #[test]
    fn s6_custom_weights() {
        let idea = make_idea("高可行低影响", "复用已有简单集成现成", Priority::Low, vec![]);
        let custom = ScoringWeights { feasibility: 0.7, impact: 0.2, urgency: 0.1 };
        let s_custom = ScoringEngine::compute(&idea, &custom);
        let s_default = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        let manual = s_custom.feasibility * 0.7 + s_custom.impact * 0.2 + s_custom.urgency * 0.1;
        println!("\n[s6] 自定义权重 (feas:0.7 / impact:0.2 / urg:0.1)");
        println!("  自定义综合={:.2}  默认综合={:.2}  手算加权={:.2}", s_custom.overall, s_default.overall, manual);
        assert!((s_custom.overall - manual).abs() < 0.01, "overall 应等于手算加权");
        assert!(s_custom.overall > s_default.overall, "高 feas 配高权重应让综合更高");
    }

    #[test]
    fn s7_clamp_upper_bound() {
        let desc = "复用已有简单集成现成成熟基于脚手架模板支持".repeat(20);
        let idea = make_idea("满分想法", &desc, Priority::Critical, vec!["a", "b", "c", "d"]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s7] clamp 上限 (堆正向词 + 超长描述 + Critical)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  影响力={:.2}  紧急度={:.2}  综合={:.2}", s.feasibility, s.impact, s.urgency, s.overall);
        assert!(s.feasibility <= 10.0 && s.impact <= 10.0 && s.urgency <= 10.0, "所有维度应≤10");
    }

    #[test]
    fn s8_clamp_lower_bound() {
        let desc = "重构迁移大规模分布式重写从零全新架构高并发底层".repeat(20);
        let idea = make_idea("灾难想法", &desc, Priority::Low, vec![]);
        let s = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&idea);
        println!("\n[s8] clamp 下限 (堆负向词 + Low)");
        println!("  可行性={:.2}  影响力={:.2}  紧急度={:.2}  综合={:.2}", s.feasibility, s.impact, s.urgency, s.overall);
        assert!(s.feasibility >= 0.0 && s.impact >= 0.0 && s.urgency >= 0.0, "所有维度应≥0");
    }

    #[test]
    fn s9_single_char_negation_suppresses_hit() {
        // 「不复用已有组件」:复用 被「不」否定不计,已有 命中 → feasibility 低于「复用已有组件」(复用+已有 双命中)
        let neg = make_idea("不复用", "不复用已有组件", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let pos = make_idea("复用", "复用已有组件", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let s_neg = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&neg);
        let s_pos = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&pos);
        println!("\n[s9] 单字否定前缀抑制命中");
        println!("  不复用已有组件 feasibility={:.2}  复用已有组件 feasibility={:.2}", s_neg.feasibility, s_pos.feasibility);
        assert!(
            s_neg.feasibility < s_pos.feasibility,
            "单字否定应抑制正向命中致 feasibility 更低: neg={} pos={}",
            s_neg.feasibility, s_pos.feasibility
        );
    }

    #[test]
    fn s10_two_char_negation_suppresses_hit() {
        // 「没有复用」:两字否定 没有 抑制 复用 命中;「确实复用」无否定 复用 命中
        let neg = make_idea("t", "没有复用", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let pos = make_idea("t", "确实复用", Priority::Medium, vec![]);
        let s_neg = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&neg);
        let s_pos = ScoringEngine::compute_default(&pos);
        println!("\n[s10] 两字否定前缀抑制命中");
        println!("  没有复用 feasibility={:.2}  确实复用 feasibility={:.2}", s_neg.feasibility, s_pos.feasibility);
        assert!(
            s_neg.feasibility < s_pos.feasibility,
            "两字否定「没有」应抑制命中: neg={} pos={}", s_neg.feasibility, s_pos.feasibility
        );
    }
}